Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Troubled by knowledge lost in the research process, the authors question the privileged status of dominant forms of research that claim to produce valid, generalizable, and replicable results. Identifying as practicing artists and teachers, they look to a/r/tography (Irwin & Springgay, 2008)--an arts-based approach to inquiry--to theorize and articulate discomfort with prevalent forms of qualitative research. Explaining how a/r/tography defies a concise definition, they demonstrate how the methodology’s key theoretical underpinnings of relationality, embodiment, and contingency aid them as they seek “to provoke, to generate, and to un/do meaning” (Springgay, 2008, p. 161). The authors use this discussion to describe how a/r/tography disrupts traditional research concepts by sharing pieces of an ongoing “story” about how they are coming to know a/r/tography.