Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Model-based instruction is important but poorly studied in chemistry. In an intervention study, we examined uses of virtual and concrete models for teaching diagram translation. Translation accuracy was compared over time for three groups that differed on the type of model (Concrete, Virtual, or none) used to give feedback to students during an intervention. Concrete models were manipulated directly by hand but virtual models were manipulated with a low-fidelity, mouse and keyboard interface. The model groups did not differ in accuracy and were better than the control group, which was provided with feedback but without models. In addition, both model groups were more accurate when tested without models and after a 7-day delay, serving as scaffolds not crutches to learning.
Andrew T. Stull, University of California - Santa Barbara
Mary Hegarty, University of California - Santa Barbara