Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The (im)possibility of ethical action that is strived for through practices of (self-)reflexivity is deeply tied to the structure of address at which accounts of oneself are given, shaping what can be said, as well as how. Intra-actions between the “self” that is (re)produced, the (pre-supposed) “other” that is addressed, and the relations of power at the site of address often generate circular motions within (self-)reflexivity through which difference is subsumed under sameness. Taking seriously the materiality of the scene of address in order to put (self-)reflexivity under precession, I argue that the material/discursive properties of video diaries produce a discomforting, spatial-temporal torque that disrupts this circular motion and produce diffractive patterns within “self”, “other”, and the structure of address.