Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
When the perceived benefits of progress outweigh the risks, we deem progress a worthy endeavor. What if actions in the name of progress subvert future progress when risks are underestimated? I argue that the replacement of the geometric paradigm with the arithmetic paradigm in the name of progress towards rigor is problematic. Drawing upon the work of Dewey and feminist scholars, I employ philosophical methods to examine how this paradigmatic shift created a chasm between embodied experiences of mathematics and the discipline, limiting opportunities for participation in the practices of mathematics and complicating its teaching and learning. I discuss implications for the design of curriculum and instruction intended to sustain broader student engagement in and identification with the mathematics community.