Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Previous research has started developing systematic methods that unify the study of cognitive, affective and social aspects of learning under a single set of theoretical assumptions. Building on this framework, this study enhances the communicational methodology into the quantifiable domain, thus enabling analysis of large quantities of classroom talk and comparisons between teachers to study identity construction processes in the mathematics classroom. We demonstrate three forms of discourse analysis: qualitative, ‘coding and counting’ and corpus analysis to analyze the ways in which two instructors at a teachers’ college differ in their “identifying talk” or the way they construct their students’ identities. Differences between the two instructors were ostensible in all forms of analysis.
Einat Heyd-Metzuyanim, University of Pittsburgh
Michal Tabach, Tel Aviv University
Talli Nachlieli, Levinsky College of Education