Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Making inferences about unobservable variables using directly observed data has been the primary interest of educational and psychological measurement. Two particular approaches, Bayesian networks (BNs) and Structure equation modeling (SEM), have become pervasive methods to serve as measurement models for educational assessment data. The present study discusses methodological similarities and differences, and then demonstrates how two approaches function differently using data set from a diagnostic assessment system called ACED. The results will guide researchers deciding which approach is most suitable for a given project when building cognitively diagnostic assessments.
Yoon Jeon Kim, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Mengyao Cui, Florida State University
Russell Almond, Florida State University