Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper describes characteristics of specific stages as well as pathways that schools tend to take as they move to different stages; these learnings can be used by leaders when they are determining their school-wide and school-based action plans.
In our findings, implementing stage 1 practices often focus on bringing schools out of chaos, implementing systems and creating stable cultures. For schools implementing stage 3 (the strongest stage), the practices focused on institutionalization/student ownership. These stages are not stagnant or fixed and most schools have practices that are in different stages of development. For example, schools may have stage 2 culture practice in place, but may be in stage 1 in terms of instructional rigor. There is not a direct correlation to student achievement data results and the stage of a school - having high student achievement may not mean that a school has all stage 3 practices in place. A school that has stagnant student achievement scores may need to implement Stage 1 practices even though 70% of their students are proficient.