Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study explores students’ development of understanding in science that emerged in writing samples as immersed in argumentation for learning science, and writing was used as argumentative practice. 41 9th grade students and 102 4th grade students engaged in a critique-based recursive writing activity that promoted students’ practice both roles of knowledge construction and critique. Four rubrics were used to examine knowledge differences that emerged in 9th grade students’ pre- and post-writing on a unit of Force and Motion in knowledge of content, argument, rhetoric, and multimodal representation. Data analysis suggests that this writing activity effectively encouraged students to engage in critique their ideas and texts, while ineffective for their deeper understanding of the topic, and using multiple representations.
SaeYeol Yoon, Delaware State University
Claudia Patricia Aguirre-Mendez, The University of Iowa
Nurcan Keles, University of Iowa
Brian Hand, University of Iowa