Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A critical component of science and math education is reasoning with data. We conducted a descriptive study in which we examined how 20 Middle School science textbooks (specifically, in 731 activities) presented opportunities for reasoning. We had two objectives: (1) to examine opportunities for reasoning with data and (2) to examine to what extent these activities are aligned with principles of learning (e.g., distributed practice; Dunlosky et al, 2013). Our results demonstrate that although half of activities in textbooks included data, very few of these activities provide opportunities to learn how to record, analyze, and interpret data and rarely made use of well-established learning principles. Our analysis suggests that science textbooks provide little support for reasoning with data.
Bradley Morris, Kent State University
Katie Baker, Baker Educational Consulting
Angela Junglen, Kent State University
Amy M. Masnick, Hofstra University