Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Recent research has highlighted the lack of a uniform definition of formative assessment, although its effectiveness is widely acknowledged. This study addresses the theoretical differences and similarities amongst three approaches to formative assessment that are currently most frequently discussed in educational research literature: Data-based decision making (DBDM), assessment for learning (AfL), and diagnostic testing (DT). This study shows that although the theoretical underpinnings of DBDM, AFL, and DT differ, possibilities for implementing an overarching formative assessment and formative evaluation approach exist. Moreover, the integration of the three assessment approaches can lead to more valid formative decisions. Future research is needed to examine the actual implementation of a mix of these three approaches, with their associated challenges and opportunities.
Fabienne Van der Kleij, Cito
Jorine Adinda Vermeulen, Universiteit Twente
Kim Schildkamp, Universiteit Twente
Theo Eggen, Cito