Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
If educators can help students find relevance, they might also promote interest and achievement. To do this, should they tell students that schoolwork is important or should they help students discover this on their own? We explore the best ways to communicate value, particularly for students with low performance expectations. Across three laboratory studies we examine three aspects of value communication: type (internally generated vs. externally provided), timing (before vs. after learning), and content (identity-independent: emphasizing general/everyday utility vs. identity-dependent: emphasizing career/future utility). We found positive gains for students with low confidence when both types of relevance are utilized together, when utility is communicated after learning, and when the content is identity-independent.
Elizabeth Ann Canning, University of Wisconsin - Madison
Yoi Tibbetts, University of Wisconsin
Judith Harackiewicz, University of Wisconsin