Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Bennett’s (2010) theory of vibrant materiality challenged researchers to give “the force of things more due” (p. viii). Barad (1995) argued for scientists to look closely at what happens between all actors in any given assemblage. Both acknowledged the importance of non-living matter in the meaning making process. Using theory of materiality and the new empiricism as a theoretical framework for thinking about classroom practice, the presenter discusses how considering her students, her teaching role, and the objects that take up classroom space informed her understanding of student engagement in a secondary language arts classroom.