Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
While much is known about problem solving, less is know about problem finding and framing, which are important STEM practices. Little is known about the role these practices play in learning. This study investigates this by contrasting cases: 1) a computer science lab group engaged in disciplinary design; 2) a biogeochemistry lab group engaged in interdisciplinary design; and 3) a chemistry class group engaged in non-disciplinary design. Existing practices were documented with field notes or video-records. A coding scheme was extended to capture how designerly practices co-occurred with learning. We found that problem framing and developing shared understanding co-occurred with attending to constraints in the chemistry and computer science examples, whereas in the interdisciplinary group, these co-occurred with ideation.
Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico
Sushilla Knottenbelt, University of New Mexico
Jennifer Buntjer, University of New Mexico