Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study examined the relationship between value-added model (VAM) evaluation practice and teachers’ feelings of efficacy, control/autonomy, and commitment to the teaching profession. In Louisiana, the elementary grades are divided into those who receive student growth data in the form of “Student Learning Target (SLT)” results and those who receive student growth data in the form of a VAM score. Perceived control over student outcomes is hypothesized to vary as it relates to self-efficacy beliefs, as SLT teachers maintain control of much of the assessment and data-driven decision-making power and VAM teachers do not. Our analysis reveals that, overall, VAM teachers expressed more feelings of doubt regarding their efficacy, lack of control over accountability results, and commitment than SLT teachers.
Timothy G. Ford, University of Oklahoma
Mary Elizabeth Van Sickle, University of Louisiana at Monroe
Michelle Fazio-Brunson, Northwestern State University of Louisiana
Lynn Violet Clark, University of Louisiana at Monroe
Tina L. Allen, Marshall University