Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Participating in mathematical discourse may be difficult for students (Yackel & Cobb, 1996), but is an important part of their mathematical education. This study compares how two teachers shape students’ participation in math classes. We describe both how participants are involved in the discourse and the nature of their participation. In one classroom, the teacher-dominated, Initiation-Response-Evaluation (IRE) (Mehan, 1979) style was combined with vague appraisals, such as “good job,” to shape student responses. The other teacher shared leadership in the discourse with students and both students and the teacher appraised specific aspects of students’ work. The second style may be more beneficial for students, as it allows them a chance to participate in the discourse in a more meaningful way.
Jeanne L. Brunner, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Gloriana Gonzalez, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michelle Perry, University of Illinois
Megan Schleppenbach, University of Chicago