Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper questions the widespread obsession with methods in English Education. We argue that the many distances educators are trying to overcome with methods actually get (re)produced by the desire for a strategy that is already organized, or that is conceived of before the class (temporally) and away from the class (spatially). These conditions ignore the actual context of the classroom, foreclosing the qualities necessary for e/affective teaching: response-ability, flexibility, and attentiveness. Relocating the formality implied by methods onto the teacher’s studentship might reinstate these qualities—a gesture that potentially repositions the teacher from the one-who-knows to the one-who-learns. Through a focus on poetics, we move away from a reliance on “methods” towards a theory of attentive composition.
Maya R. Pindyck, Teachers College, Columbia University
Patrick James Scanlon, Teachers College, Columbia University