Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Efforts to improve student performance on high-stakes assessments in mathematics place teachers in the epicenter of multiple reform expectations. While studies have documented how teachers implement single reforms, very little is known about teachers’ implementation processes or perceptions when multiple expectations are imposed. Focusing on how elements in the setting affect teachers’ decision-making regarding their implementation of instructional initiatives, this study describes how five teachers from one urban high school mathematics department enacted multiple reforms. Using multi-case study methodology, teachers’ implementation processes revealed that multiple initiatives did not result in integrated reforms. Nor did mandates themselves guarantee the adoption of reforms; rather, organization for enactment occurred when teachers perceived the context of each mandate aligned to their beliefs about teaching.