Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Increased calls for experiential learning, alongside current STEM Education reform, has afforded design as a viable pedagogical approach for teaching students science content. Science education has increasingly shown interest in design through design-based teaching methods and the NGSS. This inclusion has come with concerns from the engineering community on the ability of non-engineering educators to effectively teach engineering design (ED). To determine differences in ability of teaching ED a study was conducted across a multi-site science professional development. This paper reports preliminary findings on how PD delivered by engineering educators vs. science educators influence teachers’ delivery of the EDP differently. Findings will suggest whether teachers’ delivery of engineering content differ when taught by engineering experts vs. science experts.
Michael E. Grubbs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tyler Scott Love, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
David E. Long, George Mason University
Donna R. Sterling, George Mason University