Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A historical indicator of the quality, validity, and rigor of qualitative research has been methodological documentation of a researcher’s on-going contemplation, decisions, and processes (e.g., Freeman et al. 2007). Such thorough and reflexive descriptions of one’s research processes, including the ethical dilemmas encountered and produced throughout a study, enable others to better understand what “exemplary researchers whose methodology is innovative and effective do and how they make their work convincing” (Freeman et al. 2007, 26). In this paper, we explore elite interviewing as a unique and challenging space in which to highlight and theorize ethical difficulties in research in order to open up the conversation about validity and ethics in the context of the unique power relations of elite interviewing.