Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Teacher professional development (PD) is widely believed to be an important lever for improving student achievement (Hill, 2007). However, little is known about what types of PD improve student learning (Wayne et al., 2008). The Institute of Education Sciences (IES) therefore recently funded several Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of PD programs. As a method, the RCT is best suited for studying treatments of well-defined, easy-to-implement procedures (Murnane & Nelson, 2007). In this review, I evaluate the extent to which the recent IES-funded studies evaluate programs well-suited for study by RCT. I find that three of the seven studies teach standardized instructional routines to teachers through standardized PD experiences, two ingredients that lend a program well to a randomized evaluation.