Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Collaborative Inquiry (CI) has emerged as a dominant structure for educator professional learning that engages teachers in collaboratively investigating focused aspects of their practice. However, despite the increased presence of CI, research on CI frameworks has yet to be consolidated. The purpose of this scoping review was to examine literature on the structure, challenges, and benefits of CI. In total 42 sources were analyzed in relation to (a) CI characteristics, (b) supports and resources, (c) empirically supported benefits, and (d) enactment challenges. The review found that CI research is highly practical, describing CI steps or case study examples, and serves a 'how to' function for engaging in CI projects. The paper concludes with identified areas for future CI research.
Christopher DeLuca, Queen's University - Kingston
Ulemu Luhanga, Emory University
Jason Shulha, Queen's University - Kingston
Lyn Shulha, Queen's University - Kingston
Theodore Christou, Queen's University
Don A. Klinger, Queen's University - Kingston