Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Drawing from an “integrated, problem-solving” research framework (National Academy of Education, 1999) where both researchers and educators are accountable for successfully improving educational practices and outcomes, this paper reports qualitative data collected from teacher interviews, student surveys, learning artifacts, and classroom observations in three STEM alternative learning spaces at one urban school. The authors identify three problems schools currently face in developing student interest in STEM: 1) a rigid and narrow curriculum, 2) high failure rates in math & science courses, and 3) teacher-centered instruction. This paper reports data on how teachers addressed these problems by focusing on project-based learning, non-cognitive skill development, and alternative assessments. Implications for STEM program development are discussed.
Marco Antonio Murillo, University of California - Los Angeles
Karen Hunter Quartz, University of California - Los Angeles
Rebekah Kang, Los Angeles Unified School District
Jason Torres-Rangel