Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Research has shown that using a learner-generated drawing strategy fosters students’ engagement in generative learning during reading for textbook-based lessons, whereas results for computer-based lessons are mixed. To investigate, what causes this difference, we conducted a study following a 2x2-between-subjects design with ‘generation medium’ (paper vs. computer) and ‘reading medium’ (textbook vs. computer) as the two factors. 157 ninth graders were instructed to generate drawings (paper-based or computer-based) during reading a scientific text in a textbook or on a computer, and took three learning outcome tests afterwards (retention, transfer and drawing). Results show that drawing during reading in textbook-based lessons results in better text comprehension than computer-based drawing, mediated by perceived task difficulty and the quality of the learner-generated pictures.
Annett Schmeck (nee Schwamborn), University Duisburg - Essen
Maria Opfermann, Institute of Education - Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Hubertina Thillmann, Ruhr University Bochum
Detlev Leutner, University of Duisburg-Essen