Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

From an Indigenous Standpoint: War, Occupation, and Settler Education

Thu, April 16, 2:15 to 3:45pm, Hyatt, Floor: East Tower - Green Level, Plaza A

Abstract

The outcomes of war and education are varied and have long-lasting impacts. In the context of the United States one normally does not consider that the founding of the U.S. had to do with ongoing wars and a resulting occupation (at least from the perspective of indigenous peoples and Mexican settlers in what is now the contemporary Southwest of the U.S.). With regards to education, the outcome of such histories result in a type of education model that has its foundations in the inherent violence of wars and their aftermath. The conference theme asks: “How do various communities conceptualize justice, including the many scholarly communities within our association?” Thus, in this paper, I explore the larger scope of what it means to consider education through occupation, centering an indigenous standpoint, asking, how do settler colonial societies construct and maintain educational models and practices that make invisible occupation models of education?

To do this, I will rely on a framework of Coloniality that centers the project of settler colonialism in education (Bang et al. 2014; Calderon 2008, 2014; Sintos Coloma 2012; Tuck and Yang 2012, 2014). Coloniality refers to the manner in which modern systems of colonialism operate epistemically, economically, ontologically, politically, and spatially (Grosfuguel 2007; Lugones 2008; Mignolo 2000; Quijano 2000). In order to decolonize we need to first provide a context for the particular colonial project(s) we are responding to. In the United States we need to attend to settler colonialism; yet the idea of the United States as a settler nation, indeed colonialism, is little explored in educational research (Coloma, Means, & Kim 2009). I maintain that this work is key in order to cultivate holistic (Cajete 1994; Pewewardy 2002) educational ideas and practices that can speak to the complex needs of indigenous peoples and truly make space for decolonizing approaches in education. The sources I use for this analysis include Indian federal policies and current policies pushing for privatization of education.

The study presents a timely entry into the growing area of inquiry of decolonial studies in education. Moreover, this discussion reminds us that as we speak of decolonizing work, we must remain attendant to the inherent land-based components of this work (Tuck and Yang 2012). In other words, to decolonize, affirms a radical (or not so radical depending on your positionality) understanding of education as a mechanism of occupation that implies on ongoing “war” with populations that do not facilitate the continued occupation of territory, or what Tuck and Yang (2012) refer to as “settler futurity.” Such an understanding is fundamental to the conference theme: “[w]e have the opportunity and the moral obligation to apply principles and evidence from social science research and theorizing to the problems of injustice.” We cannot continue to ignore the injustice of occupation in our moral obligation to create pedagogical spaces of hope and humanity.

Author