Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Objective
During the 2013-14 school year, at the behest of a large urban school district, we collaborated with mathematics teachers at three schools (elementary, middle and high) on a pilot project that proposed a new approach for the development of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs).
Theoretical Framework
Although SLOs are being used in many school districts as measures of student growth for teacher evaluation purposes, the theoretical basis for their development has received little attention. In this work we use the assessment triangle (Pellegrino, Chudowsky & Glaser, 2001) and learning progressions (LPs; Clements & Sarama, 2009; Masters & Forster, 1996) as a framework for writing and evaluating SLOs.
Methods
This was a qualitative case study in which a new model for teacher professional development in the writing of SLOs, with LPs as the conceptual framework, was explored across three school sites that differed in grade level configuration. Methods of inquiry included direct observations of teachers, surveys and the gathering of artifacts (e.g., drafts of LPs, assessment tasks and scoring rubrics). We focus on similarities and differences in SLO development across the three sites.
Results
Most participants provided positive feedback about the opportunity for vertical collaborations across grades and the use of the learning progression as an organizational tool for instruction. However, teachers also struggled to shift from a “get it or they don’t” conception of student learning to a conception rooted in growth. We discuss lessons learned and implications for generalizing the approach across all grades and subjects within a school district.
Derek C. Briggs, University of Colorado, Boulder
Frederick Peck, University of Montana - Missoula
Jessica Alzen, University of Colorado - Boulder