Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study examines how different approaches to education governance constrain and facilitate the work of schools, districts, and states, demonstrating relationships and tensions among political actors and organizations involved in decision making and implementation. Researchers conducted 68 semi-structured interviews of state and local policy actors across eight states strategically chosen for their classification in a typology researchers devised from states’ (a) levels of local versus state control, (b) fragmented versus unified policy environment, and (c) democratic versus politicized processes. Interviews centered around (a) curriculum guidelines adoption, (b) annual teacher evaluations, (c) teacher licensure/certification, (d) instructional materials adoption, (e) takeover of schools/districts, and (f) taxation authority. Findings supported similarities and differences on the bases of typology classification.
Joanna R. Smith, University of Oregon
Michael Thier, International Baccalaureate
Ross C Anderson, Educational Policy Improvement Center
Hovanes Gasparian, University of Southern California
Christine Pitts, University of Oregon
Yue Shen, University of Oregon