Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A large-scale randomized study of two prominent comprehensive teacher induction (CTI) programs reported that the experimental programs were no more effective than a “business-as-usual” setting in improving new teachers’ classroom practices. However the control teachers were more likely to receive mentoring from teachers in the same schools than the experimental teachers. This study explores the role of the in-house mentoring in the CTI study. We look into the nature and quality of the in-house mentoring and examine its effects on new teachers’ classroom management under each treatment condition and then by subgroups of teachers. In addition, we investigate in-house mentoring as a mediator of the program effects. Our findings have important implications for design and implementation of future teacher induction programs.