Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In this paper I offer an examination of findings from a recently completed qualitative study conducted in the southeastern region of the U.S. that asked nine teachers at three Title I schools to explain how they designed and justified instructional practices based on their interpretations of their students’ Scholastic Achievement Test 10 (SAT 10) data. I frame the teachers’ reported practices as responses formed in the context of the governmentality undergirding current accountability testing policy. Further, I look at how teachers and school leaders appropriated a complexity of deficit thinking and meritocratic discourses along with discourses of teacher professional and experiential knowledge within the accountability context to justify these practices.