Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Towns that border Indian reservations provide an important context for studying relationships between predominantly mainstream institutions and tribal communities. This comparative policy analysis applies critical discourse methodologies to evaluate policies from five districts bordering reservations and five districts geographically distant from reservations. Findings reveal use of discriminatory discourse that supports exclusion, role allocation, and functionalization. In particular, districts at a distance from reservations have non-resident student admission policies that allow for flexibility, empower students, and note few specific requirements for admission. In comparison, reservation bordertown district policies reinforce dominant culture power structures, use deficit-oriented language, and list extensive requirements. The study holds implications for policymakers, social justice advocates, district leadership, and community members working to enhance inclusiveness and social justice.