Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This work investigated the online targeting behavior of peer-assessors with their probable reasons in three identity revelation modes (real-name, nickname, and anonymity). A pretest and posttest quasi-experimental research design was adopted. Six fifth-grade classes (N=192) participated. Results obtained from the two-way contingency table analysis and Wilcoxon tests include: 1) both high- and low-targeted assessees’ redundancy rates were high in the pre-treatment and treatment conditions for all groups; 2) different identity modes and assessee redundancy were not considerably related for high- and low-targeted assessees; 3) no significant differences in the number of assessments that participants received between the pre-treatment and treatment conditions for all participating classes; 4) determining reasons for peer-assessors’ targeting behavior revealed similar ranking pattern for different identity modes.