Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper describes a study of self-dialogues, peer dialogues and supervisory dialogues in the context of student teacher workplace learning. We found that the three types of dialogues, although using similar procedures, such as videoed incidents and reflection questions, had different characteristics and strengths. Self-dialogues voiced different I positions constituting the development student teachers’ professional identities. Peer dialogues elicited argumentations for appraisals and provided recognition and reassurance. Supervisory dialogues demonstrated scaffolding and offered advice and encouragement.
Dubravka Knezic, Utrecht University
Paulien C. Meijer, Radboud University Nijmegen
Auli Toom, University of Helsinki
Jukka Husu, University of Turku
Äli Leijen, University of Tartu
Juan-José Mena Marcos, Universidad de Salamanca
Raili Allas, University of Tartu
Margus Pedaste, University of Tartu
Edgar Krull, University of Tartu