Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this study is to contribute education research from the mentoring field. An objective of this review of the scholarly literature on mentoring is to spark debate about contemporary issues on democracy and mentoring in published research. The researcher describes some perspectives on critical contemporary issues by exploring tensions between democratic (e.g., alternative) and nondemocratic (e.g., traditional) mentoring. Emphases were given to scholarly reviews of the mentoring literature, articles published in a premier mentoring journal, and books from a series on mentoring perspectives. Six primary mentoring tensions discovered for educating diverse democracies are: informal mentoring and formal mentoring; identical mentoring and diverse mentoring; mentoring and coaching; mentoring and induction, face-to-face and e-mentoring, and self-regulated mentoring and other-directed mentoring.