Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This study extends current research on the refutation text effect by examining the interactions between refutation text and graphics. Like refutation verbal material, refutation graphics are designed to activate a misconception, refute it, and present the correct conception. Seventy-eight high schoolers were randomly assigned to four conditions differing for type of text and graphic (standard vs. refutation) in a pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest design.
Findings revealed that a refutation text is more powerful than a refutation graphic, and the former can be sufficient to maintain the learning effect over time. Moreover, readers of the refutation text with standard graphic showed greater metacognitive awareness of the conflict between their conception and the scientific conception than readers in the control condition.