Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Armstrong and Hamilton (2013) proposed a framework of three college pathways – party, professional, and mobility – that lead to economically unequal post-graduation outcomes for female students. Using the data National Survey of Student Engagement data, we examined the responses from 42,504 women seniors at 183 four-year large public institutions to identify how the potential income of their college major choice relate to the pathways. We found that the economic advantage of major choice is not equally distributed among students: party pathway students select the least lucrative college majors, professional pathway students select the most lucrative majors, and first-generation students on all pathways tend to select majors with less potential income than their peers with college-educated parents.
Malika Tukibayeva, Indiana University
Amy Ribera, Indiana University
Thomas F. Nelson Laird, Indiana University
Allison BrckaLorenz, Indiana University