Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study investigated readers’ moment-by-moment affective and cognitive processing of a series of refutation texts. A think-aloud methodology was used to explore processes readers expressed while reading texts that refuted common misconceptions. A written posttest assessed their post-reading beliefs. The think-aloud analysis highlighted at which points in the texts readers expressed positive or negative emotions and their relations to cognitive processes with which they dealt with these discrepancies – successfully or unsuccessfully, as indicated by post-reading scores. The findings show how refutational sentences suppress positive emotions associated with non-coherence building processes and are consistent with frameworks of knowledge revision and achievement emotions.
Gregory Trevors, McGill University
Reese Butterfuss, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
Panayiota Kendeou, University of Minnesota