Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
We investigate how alerts based on automated scoring of student-generated work can support teachers to guide struggling students’ to develop more robust scientific ideas. In Study 1, we examine how the combination of automated guidance and teacher alerts effects student learning, compared to multiple rounds of automated guidance only. In Study 2, we compare two types of teacher alerts based on different possible automatically scored indicators of student science learning. We draw on evidence from pre/post test and embedded assessments. The studies demonstrate a combination of automated guidance plus the teacher alert is more effective than automated guidance alone for low-scoring students. Short essays serve as an optimal prompt to structure teacher-student discussions on science reasoning.
Libby F. Gerard, University of California - Berkeley
Jonathan Michael Vitale, University of California - Berkeley
Dermot Francis Donnelly, California State University - Fresno
Marcia Linn, University of California - Berkeley