Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Variables designated as “grit” and “growth mindset” have become extensively proposed as critical motivational contributors to learning and performance. There is currently insufficient evidence, however, supporting these claims. Accordingly, we examined whether these constructs accounted for incremental variance over and above cognitive ability—as indexed by standardized test scores—in the prediction of academic achievement. Hierarchical regression and commonality analysis assessed whether each variable contributed to students’ (N = 333) grades in introductory psychology after controlling for test scores. Incremental predictive validity was found for grit (∆R2 = 2.6%, p < .01), but not growth mindset (∆R2 = .2%, ns), suggesting that evidence for noncognitive factors on student achievement must take into account students’ cognitive ability.
Lawrence I. Cho, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Stuart A. Karabenick, University of Michigan
William Gehring, University of Michigan