Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Incremental Analysis of "Noncognitive" Predictors of Achievement: Determining Contributions Over Measures of Cognitive Ability

Sat, April 9, 8:15 to 9:45am, Convention Center, Floor: Level Two, Exhibit Hall D

Abstract

Variables designated as “grit” and “growth mindset” have become extensively proposed as critical motivational contributors to learning and performance. There is currently insufficient evidence, however, supporting these claims. Accordingly, we examined whether these constructs accounted for incremental variance over and above cognitive ability—as indexed by standardized test scores—in the prediction of academic achievement. Hierarchical regression and commonality analysis assessed whether each variable contributed to students’ (N = 333) grades in introductory psychology after controlling for test scores. Incremental predictive validity was found for grit (∆R2 = 2.6%, p < .01), but not growth mindset (∆R2 = .2%, ns), suggesting that evidence for noncognitive factors on student achievement must take into account students’ cognitive ability.

Authors