Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper considers 1950’s and 1960’s research-related texts about the “television teacher” along with more recent research-related calls for practice-based teacher education reform (e.g., Darling-Hammond, 2010). The teacher-as-subject is explored as a “phantomic ontology” (Schrader, 2010) that may invite alternative possibilities to the binary and paradoxical reasoning used to justify systemic practice-based teacher education reforms. These possibilities include making visible the logics of transformations promising to make more “regular” people into “competent” and “professional” teachers (e.g., Ball & Forzani, 2011). Such transformations attempt to minimize uncertainty and “risk” for children through faith in performances and practices that may include enacting inauthentic practices, resisting feared possible selves, and commodifying children (e.g., Ball & Forzani, 2011; Darling-Hammond, 2006; Ronfeldt & Grossman, 2008).