Curriculum Reform With a School-Based Approach in Hong Kong: Intellectual, Structural, and Cultural Challenges

• In Event: Education Reforms in High-Performing Systems: Canada, Finland, Hong Kong, and Singapore

Abstract

School-based approach is a major attempt of education reforms to enhance and improve school performance and to meet the high demand of quality education in the society (Caldwell & Spinks, 2013; Cheng, 2015; Griffin, McGaw & Care, 2012). Curriculum reform with a school-based approach offers schools and teachers with high professional autonomy and technical flexibility to develop school-based curriculum and pedagogies to better fit the needs of students in the context (Harris, 2003).

Although the initiatives of Hong Kong school-based curriculum development in the last decade have produced some successful outcomes (Cheung & Wong, 2011; Yuen, Cheung & Wong, 2012), there have been some challenges worth for further investigation (Cheng, 2014; Lee, 2014). Through reviewing the Hong Kong experiences and related international evidence, this paper has identified the key challenges and difficulties to the curriculum reform in a school-based approach in three aspects. In the intellectual aspects, since there was lack of professional input in developing a strong knowledge base for curriculum development, most school-based curriculum initiatives or innovations were too piecemeal, fragmented and thin. In the structural aspects, as many teachers wasted a lot of time to “re-invent a wheel” or “scratch from beginning in developing school-based curriculum, they did not have sufficient time and energy to be effective in teaching and helping students. Culturally, the reliance on the school management to steer the school-based reforms would create potential conflicts between the senior management and teachers if leaders were not well prepared to do it and change the culture. A cooperative platform integrating central bureaucracy intelligence and school-based initiatives is thus suggested to enhance a balanced development in the future (Cheng, 2005). International implications will be discussed.


Caldwell, B. J., & Spinks, J. M. (2013). The Self-Transforming School. London: Routledge.
Cheng, Y. C. (2005). New paradigm for re-engineering education: Globalization, localization and individualization. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Cheng, Y. C. (2015). Globalization and Hong Kong educational reforms. In J. Zajda (ed.) Second international handbook on globalization, education and policy research, (pp.219-242). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Cheung, A. C. K. & Wong, P. M. (2011), Effects of school heads’ and teachers’ agreement with the curriculum reform on curriculum development progress and student learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(5) 453-473.
Griffin, P., McGaw, B. & Care, E. (2012), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership and school improvement. In A. Harris, C. Day, D. Hopkins, M. Hadfield, A. Hargreaves, & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp.73-83). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
Lee, J. C. K. (2014). Curriculum and teaching reforms: Challenges and prospects. In C. Marsh & J.C.K. Lee (Eds.), Asia’s high performing education systems: The case of Hong Kong (pp.338-354). London: Routledge.
Yuen, T. W. W., Cheung, A. C. K., & Wong, P. M. (2012). A study of the impact of the first phase of the curriculum reform on student learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(7) 710-728.

Authors

• Theodore Tai Hoi Lee, The Hong Kong Institute of Education

• Yin Cheong Cheng, The Hong Kong Institute of Education

• James Y.O. Ko, Hong Kong Institute of Education