Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The credibility of the ‘austerity ideology’ on world economic thinking over the past five or so years has now been seriously questioned if not discredited (Krugman 2015). A growing body of research indicates that harsh austerity measures can stunt economic growth and impede economic recovery (Voszka and Kiss, 2014). Nevertheless, across the UK the cross-party political support for austerity has seen swingeing cuts in public services thereby exacerbating efforts to tackle already stubborn inequalities in communities, including educational outcomes.
Within this context, this paper considers findings from research on a national education change initiative, the School Improvement Partnership Programme (SIPP) to assess the use of collaborative partnerships to tackle educational inequity in a mature system.
The SIPP was introduced by the Scottish Government in 2013 to tackle educational inequity and promote attainment among young people in areas of deprivation. The approaches developed in the SIPP including collaboration within, between and across schools and local authorities/districts; Collaborative Action Research (CAR); and the use of evidence to drive innovation are now informing wider public education and voluntary services as they develop new strategies to tackle inequity.
Christopher James Chapman, University of Glasgow
Hannah Renee Chestnutt, University of Glasgow
Stuart Hall, University of Glasgow
Niamh Friel, University of Glasgow
Kevin Lowden, University of Glasgow