Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Type: Symposium
Engaging students in argumentation is central to new curriculum standards around the world. A preponderance of educational research on argumentation focuses on the structure of arguments--whether the arguments have certain structural parts of arguments such as claims, evidence, and warrants. Although a focus on argument structure is a productive starting point, there is more to argument quality than structure alone, and the field urgently needs new approaches to conceptualize argument quality. In this symposium, we bring together new research on argumentation that expands our view of argumentation quality beyond structure. Each of the four papers will advance new conceptualizations of argumentation quality, as well as methodologies to analyze argumentation that capture these new dimensions of argument quality.
Epistemic Criteria and Reliable Processes as Indicators of Argument Quality in Science Students' Argumentation - Clark A. Chinn, Rutgers University; Ravit Golan Duncan, Rutgers University; Leah C.-C. Hung, Rutgers University; Ron Rinehart, Rutgers University
The Importance of Examining the Cognitive, Epistemic, and Social Aspects of Scientific Argumentation - Victor Dale Sampson, The University of Texas - Austin
Mobilization of Emotions as Argumentative Resources in Argumentation About Vegetarianism - Pablo Brocos, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela; Maria Pilar Jimenez-Aleixandre, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Using Social Network Analysis to Examine Interactional Patterns in Scientific Argumentation - Maria Gonzalez-Howard, Boston College; Katherine L. McNeill, Boston College