Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This theoretical argument addresses how teachers should address the issue of transgender bathroom rights in the wake of the 2016 House Bill 2 law passed in North Carolina. I analyze the issue using the three most commonly cited criteria for determining the openness of controversial issues: the epistemic criterion, the political criterion, and the politically authentic criterion. I then discuss the challenges teachers face when confronted with issues that are epistemically settled but publicly open and implicate students’ identities. I conclude by arguing that in those cases in which there exists a clear empirical justification for teaching an issue that implicates students’ identities as settled, doing so may be prudent even if it limits democratic discourse.