Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
According to the Common Core “Development Process” web page, the government, educational thinkers, teachers, and parents all contributed to the creation of standards document. Conspicuously absent from this detailed history is any input from students. The standards were intended to significantly shift the expectations for teaching and learning in public schools (Porter, McMaken, Hwang & Yang, 2011), but, few, if any scholarly studies have asked students how they perceive the instructional changes. Here, I report on interviews of 54 college-bound seniors from traditionally underserved populations regarding the extent to which students perceived the teaching of the new standards to be relevant to their homes and communities.
What did these students say about the transition to the Common Core standards? The interviews revealed a narrow instructional focus on canonical texts and European-centric perspectives in the content of their classrooms. The vibrant cultural resources of the surrounding urban neighborhoods or the collective challenges faced by nearby residents rarely found their way into the curriculum. The Common Core’s silence on issues of cultural relevance and its implicit support of canonical texts constitute a missed opportunity to promote critical, culturally relevant pedagogy, an important resource for college readiness for students from traditionally marginalized backgrounds.
Suneal Kolluri, University of Southern California
William G. Tierney, University of Southern California