Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The narratives in this paper utilize satire and metaphor to critically examine and artistically express experiences of oppression within academia. The focus of the stories is each narrator’s own political experiences revolving around how the groupthink phenomenon suppresses scholarly dialogue, promotes mediocrity, incites micro-aggressive behaviors, and retains the status quo.
Mediocrity and divisiveness tend to rule in this type of political setting where ingroups (groupthink) organically emerge and gain power and outgroups (congenial heretics) are systematically curbed in programmatic and institutional involvement. Strategies or approaches for ensuring that one’s scholarly voice is heard, acknowledged, and considered are narratively explored to effectively challenge the growing trend of pedestrian processes that subdue progress within academia.
Denise M. McDonald, University of Houston - Clear Lake
Carol A. Carman, University of Houston - Clear Lake
Cheryl J. Craig, Texas A&M University
Caroline M. Crawford, University of Houston - Clear Lake