Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Screening tools for response-to-intervention (RTI) should be reliable, valid and practical, accurately identify risk, and have high consequential validity. The district in which we conduct research uses the DRA-2, which lacks sufficient reliability, validity, and practicality. Compared to the DRA-2, the Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension (TOSREC) is practical and has adequate reliability and validity. We compared both tests on the ability to distinguish students at-risk for reading failure in 39 second graders, in one urban school. Analyses of DRA-2 and TOSREC scores revealed comparable sensitivity, specificity, and classification accuracy. Adjustments, for indiscriminant application of DRA-2 scores in determining eligibility for RTI, revealed higher sensitivity for the TOSREC. Findings suggest that TOSREC can be a viable screening alternative.
Cheryl C. Durwin, Southern Connecticut State University
Dina L. Moore, Southern Connecticut State University
Deborah A Carroll, Southern Connecticut State University