Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study examines the learning experience that members of CS participation communities gain through their involvement.
A recent review of participation in CS projects indicates a need for further research into their educational value and experience (Edwards, 2014). Kloetzer et al. (2013) identifies three levels of learning in CS participation projects. The first is related to the mechanics of the activities (activity-learning) the second focuses on the project and the science behind it (on-topic-learning) and the third is associated with the learning within the community (community-learning).
Still, the organisation of CS projects shows that scientific goals in CS projects precede the learning goals thus learning happens as a side-effect of the training toward the completion of project targets. To address the opportunity to provide more explicit educational benefits, citizen-inquiry-communities have been developed that combine citizen science with inquiry-led learning. In such communities, citizens are supported to create and facilitate personally meaningful investigations in collaboration with scientists and the online environment is structured to enable collaborative inquiry learning (Aristeidou, Scanlon & Sharples, 2013).
The focus of this work is around two citizen-inquiry-communities: ‘Inquiring Rock Hunters’ and ‘Weather-it’. The communities were accommodated by the nQuire platform (Villasclara-Fernandez et al., 2013) and the nQuire-it toolkit (Herodotou, Villasclaras-Fernandez, & Sharples, 2014), software that allows users to initiate, manage, share and complete inquiry projects of their own interest.
Approach and data sources
This work investigates types of learning taking place within the two communities, in relation to inquiry behaviour and patterns, scientific vocabulary, and self-reported knowledge. The analysis of types of learning takes into account the framework by Kloetzer et al. (2013) around the three levels of learning in citizen participation communities. Content analysis looked at evidence of inquiry and vocabulary progress. Thematic analysis categorized responses from user surveys around aspects of self-reported knowledge.
Results
The main findings are that members gained content knowledge around the scientific topic and its methods (e.g. identification, data annotation), broke down some misconceptions, got involved in inquiry through discussions and oppositions, and produced a more scientific community vocabulary. It has also been identified that in Inquiring Rock Hunters, where inquiry phases were highlighted to the users, members were more aware of the scientific process. On the other hand, in the more user-led Weather-it community, members found their participation more enjoyable. Evidence from both communities shows that a number of members were concerned about whether they were making valuable contributions.
Design recommendations that aim to improve learning experience in CS participation communities include:
Facilitating learning through inquiry as part of a complete scientific process;
Balancing the enjoyable parts of the projects with gains in scientific literacy;
Involving experts more in creating support groups in order to enhance members’ confidence and convey quality science topic culture and learning;
Facilitating the language culture with a tool that allows input of online glossary to particular investigations.
Significance
Reflection on the main findings led to the above design suggestions that aim to facilitate the learning experience of members in online communities of scientific investigations.
Maria Aristeidou, The Open University
Eileen Scanlon, The Open University
Mike Sharples, The Open University