Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Research within the Cognitive load theory (CLT) framework typically assumes motivation as a precursor to learning, rather than an outcome of instruction. In this study, we observe changes in learners’ motivational beliefs as outcomes of their cognitive processes, through CLT lens. Using double-blind quasi-experimental design, we manipulate the level of cognitive load of instruction and assess changes in self-efficacy from pre- to post-intervention. Data from students enrolled in an undergraduate biology course (n=2,078), showed that students in the treatment condition revealed significantly higher performance and self-efficacy scores. However, self-efficacy was not significantly related to performance. These findings present a foundation to further investigate connections between historically distinct theoretical frameworks such as CLT and social cognitive theory.
Joana Franco, Utah State University
David F. Feldon, Utah State University
James Peugh, University of Virginia
Cathy Maahs-Fladung, Utah State University