Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Increasing criticism of using closed-book standardized examinations to demonstrate a physicians’ minimum competency in the Maintenance of Certification (MOC) process has prompted certifying boards to explore alternative assessments formats. This study explores the impact of introducing access to approved references during an otherwise traditional MOC examination as a way to address this criticism. Preliminary research suggests that test takers with access to references perform better than those testing in previous cohorts without references. However, while performance improved, test takers believed they were not given sufficient time to complete the examination. Applications of this study for improving MOC assessment are discussed with concern for how allowing references ultimately modifies the construct that the examination was intended to assess.
Richard A. Feinberg, National Board of Medical Examiners
Daniel Pacheco Jurich, National Board of Medical Examiners
Lauren Foster, National Board of Medical Examiners