Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Research has shown that students learn best when problems “jump out” of textbooks and into the real world (Lesh and Doerr, 2003; Blum and Ferri, 2009; Hiebert, Carpenter, Fennema, Fuson, Human, Murray, and Wearne,1996). However, implementing mathematical activities that make a connection to the real-world is not an easy task. This is especially true if the instruction is intended to be delivered to students of differing achievement levels. This research compares and contrasts the solutions–to an open-ended real-life mathematical problem–of students at differing levels of performance (i.e., low, average, or high performing) in a Mexican high school. Preliminary results show that achievement level is not an accurate way to evaluate students’ ability to solve real-life problems.