Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Advancing our understanding of learning requires comprehensive diagnostic measures. Researchers often develop instruments using correctness scores (and a variety of theories and techniques, such as Item Response Theory) for validation and scoring. Less frequently, observations of children’s strategies are incorporated into the design, development, and application of assessments. We conducted 1131 one-on-one interviews involving 833 pre-K to Grade 3 children using measurement assessment items, recording both correctness and, when observable, strategy use. Here we conduct qualitative analysis of children’s strategies to validate the interpretation of items, including their assignment to levels of a theoretical developmental progression to to guide and inform the larger, statistical analyses.
Douglas W. Van Dine, Metropolitan State University of Denver
Julie Sarama, University of Denver
Douglas H. Clements, University of Denver
Curtis Tatsuoka, Case Western Reserve University
Kikum Tatsuoka, Teachers College, Columbia University